TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW
Every time Abbey speaks nothing of importance is said.
Socialists dont have minds to begin with
CNN IMPLODES Over Conservative Guest DROPPING TRUTH NUKE As ENTIRE Panel TURNS AGAINST Mamdani Stunt
TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW
Every time Abbey speaks nothing of importance is said.
Socialists dont have minds to begin with
It is going to be truely interesting as New Yorks DE B T rises and there ability to fund it decreases.
“We the People” need to stop watching, listening, reading anything these TV talking heads and so-called reporters want to opine about. “They” DO NOT provide news, but rather propagandize their agendas. This has got to stop. People should be able to go “news” sources, and get THE NEWS. Journalism is RIP in the USA, and that is so very bad…and sad.
I agree and I disagree. I disagree because I think we need to know how wrong-headed these people really are. We need to know what kind of crap they are feeding people who cannot or will not think for themselves.
I agree people should stop watching them, although it’s such a win when they show how dumb they are in front of the world.
I really wish they would go away or be silenced, but that is not how democracy works. The real issue is that they are not held accountable for their ignorance.
I was taught that it is fine to speak your mind, but you should be able to defend what you say, That means you need to have some knowledge behind opposing arguments, apply critical logic and for goodness sakes, do some homework!
Hurray for sanctuary cities with criminal non taxpayers and homeless camps. Run the millionaires and billionaires out with you stupid tax increase to support the sanctuary give away programs!
Only The First News, NewsMax, The Epoch Times, IMPRIMIS and The Verdict Newsletters are fac based with evidence. The First News had three awesome programs on today. “The Great Education Reset,” “The Future for Freedom,” and “Politics by Faith, The Age of Assassination.”
If I were Ken Griffin, I would halt all investment in NY City.
To her (albeit limited and misinformed) credit, she appears to understand the inherent danger of “hoarding wealth”.
Unfortunately, she is upside down in her argument. We the people do not want those with wealth to stop participating in the economy, taxing them into oblivion will do exactly that. Why would they continue to take risks? Why would they invest in endeavors that provide jobs and that generate more wealth?
In my mind “hoarding wealth” means opting out of growth. What does it mean in her mind?
I love how she attacks Elon Musk for benefitting from the government.
Three points come to mind:
First, governments should be investing in projects that benefit taxpayers and it is best to do business with those who are successful.
Second, in her world, Musk would be giving good money after bad returns instead of taking risks and generating economic growth. Afterall, we don’t want him hoarding wealth (BTW, it’s his money, he can stuff it in a mattress or paper his walls with it, how is anyone entitled to what he has earned – yes AOC I said “earned it”)
Third, lots of people benefit from the government, would it be a better world if Elon depended on SNAP? Nancy Pelosi and other thieving politicians have benefitted, not through honest means but through fraud and cheating, I never hear the democrats squawk about that.
I apologize for the long post, but I won’t apologize for my views. I have long believed that the biggest threat to democracy is the ever-widening gap between the rich and poor, the eroding of the middle class, the absence of generational wealth. A strong middle class is the foundation of a civilized society; a democracy cannot exist without it.