am I the only one that calls Nov. 22 1963 an insurrection? WHY? Was not the POTUS killed? And who got rich afterwards? Another thing you need to know, the foul mouthed socialist, big eared Texan, is that he had his own sister assassinated by his “hit man”. Amerika has been socialist since before 1861 (the Southern states separated) when taxes were sent north to build up the yankee states & cities. After JFK was killed, Amerika became an oligarchy “those with the gold (corps.) make the rules”. IF YOU can’t leave (separate from the abuse) YOU ain’t free.
Tim, not that I totally disagree with your point of view, but I am not the kind who reads “fictional alternative history” novels and believe them to be the god’s honest truth today. Harry Turtledove is an author who writes alternative history, one of his books entitled “Guns of the South” 2nd writing, is about what the United States would look like if the South had actually won the Civil War. Interesting reading, and when I read your comments, I see many parallels to your comments. Again, I am not finding fault with your thoughts, I just hope they are not based on a fictional alternative history novel.
The JFK assassination was a professional hit job. Oswald may or may not have had anything to do with it. Jackie Kennedy said the Warren Commission was a “whitewash” and Oswald was a “patsy”. Who had the most to gain from JFK’s assassination? The foul mouth, bid eared Texan.
Oswald supposedly used a clunky, bolt action rifle. If you were going to shoot a moving target at a distance, you wouldn’t use that. You’d use a semi-automatic rifle instead. Tests proved that Oswald wouldn’t have had time to pull off all those shots in such a short time with a clunky bolt action rifle. The coup d grace shot to JFK’s head came from the front, not from behind. The exit wound is always much larger than the entry wound.
am I the only one that calls Nov. 22 1963 an insurrection? WHY? Was not the POTUS killed? And who got rich afterwards? Another thing you need to know, the foul mouthed socialist, big eared Texan, is that he had his own sister assassinated by his “hit man”. Amerika has been socialist since before 1861 (the Southern states separated) when taxes were sent north to build up the yankee states & cities. After JFK was killed, Amerika became an oligarchy “those with the gold (corps.) make the rules”. IF YOU can’t leave (separate from the abuse) YOU ain’t free.
Tim, not that I totally disagree with your point of view, but I am not the kind who reads “fictional alternative history” novels and believe them to be the god’s honest truth today. Harry Turtledove is an author who writes alternative history, one of his books entitled “Guns of the South” 2nd writing, is about what the United States would look like if the South had actually won the Civil War. Interesting reading, and when I read your comments, I see many parallels to your comments. Again, I am not finding fault with your thoughts, I just hope they are not based on a fictional alternative history novel.
The JFK assassination was a professional hit job. Oswald may or may not have had anything to do with it. Jackie Kennedy said the Warren Commission was a “whitewash” and Oswald was a “patsy”. Who had the most to gain from JFK’s assassination? The foul mouth, bid eared Texan.
Oswald supposedly used a clunky, bolt action rifle. If you were going to shoot a moving target at a distance, you wouldn’t use that. You’d use a semi-automatic rifle instead. Tests proved that Oswald wouldn’t have had time to pull off all those shots in such a short time with a clunky bolt action rifle. The coup d grace shot to JFK’s head came from the front, not from behind. The exit wound is always much larger than the entry wound.